• Home
  • Security Consultant
  • Expert Witness
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • Media Interviews
  • Contact

Crime Doctor

Making Places Safe

Security Guard Force Continuum – Avoid Excessive Use of Force Claims

May 12, 2018 Chris McGoey

Security Guard Force Continuum.  Security guards and security officers assigned to an active post may find themselves in a situation where they are required to take a criminal into custody or defend themselves. Security guards are not police officers. So how much force is a security officer allowed to use when performing their duty in a potentially dangerous situation?

Use of force Continuum graphic

How Much Force Can be Used under the Security Guard Force Continuum?

Of course, it depends on the situation and how the officer is equipped. For the purpose of this article, assume the security officer is fully equipped with a handgun, PR-24 baton, pepper spray, and handcuffs.

Of course, the security officer would have to be properly licensed, hold necessary permits, be fully trained, and only carry legal and authorized weapons.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Reasonable Force

Unlike police officers, security officers are not required to ever make an arrest. Most security officers merely observe and report and call the police if a crime occurs in their presence.

However, when a security guard or security officer needs to take someone into custody for a crime, he or she must use reason and common sense. The law varies from state to state but generally allows citizens to make an arrest and use reasonable force in doing so.

One common definition of reasonable force is simply not to be excessive, under the circumstances. This means to consider the seriousness of the crime, the risk of harm for everyone, and the immediacy of the situation. The preference always is to get a law enforcement response to affect the arrest.

For example, a petty shoplifting suspect might respond to the physical presence of the officer, their verbal commands, and should require no more than holding force to make detention. See my web page Shoplifting: Detention & Arrest.

After office presence and verbal commands fail, a violent suspect might require more physical force to subdue, and chemical sprays or the baton might be needed for self-defense. The choices and variations are endless.

Do not use excessive force under the wrong circumstances. You should always consider the use of force as a measured continuum from no force to deadly force. Choosing just the level of force necessary to overcome the obstacle is usually judged as reasonable.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Six Universal Levels

The concept of a force continuum has been around for years and is taught at most police academies. The force continuum is broken down into six broad levels. Each level is designed to have an elastic factor as the need for force changes as the situation evolves.

It is common for the level of force to go from level two to level three and back again in a matter of seconds. The force level should always be appropriate for the circumstances and adjust up and down as the situation requires.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Level One

Officer Presence. The mere presence of a highly visible uniformed security officer or a marked vehicle is often enough to stop a crime in progress or prevent future crime. Included in officer presence are standing, walking, running, and use of vehicle lights, horn, or speaker. Without saying a word, an alert officer can deter crime or direct criminals away by the use of body language and gestures. At this level, gestures should be non-threatening and professional.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Level Two

Verbal Communication. Used in combination with a visible presence, the use of the voice can usually achieve the desired results. Words can be whispered, used normally, or shouted to be effective.

The content of the message is as important as your demeanor. It’s always best to start out calm but firm and non-threatening. The choice of words and intensity can be increased as necessary or used in short commands in serious situations. The right combination of words in combination with officer presence can de-escalate a tense situation and prevent the need for a physical altercation.

Ongoing training and experience improve the ability of a security officer to communicate effectively with everyone including the police. However, not all aggressive people respond to words alone.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Level Three

Control Holds & Restraints. Certain situations may arise where words alone and strong warnings do not reduce aggression in an offender. Sometimes security officers will need to get involved physically for self-defense or to take someone into custody. There is a wide range of reasonable responses under the changing circumstances of a dynamic situation like a fight that requires hands-on self-defense.

At this level, the minimal force would involve the use of bare hands to guide, hold, or restrain. At low intensity, this level does not include offensive moves such as punching, tackling, and choking without legal justification like self-defense from bodily injury. But as a situation becomes more intense, punching or taking someone down to the ground may be necessary to quickly resolve a threat but this use of force must stop as the threat level deescalates. Pain compliance holds could apply here, but only after ordinary holds fail to control an aggressive or dangerous suspect.

An expandable baton or PR-24 can only be used at this level as a self-defense mechanism to block blows or to temporarily restrain a suspect but not as an impact weapon.

Handcuffs can be used as a restraint device if the security officer has been trained to do so. Not every suspect needs to be handcuffed. They should only be used on a person who exhibits physical aggression, poses a real threat, or where escape is a real possibility.

Handcuffs should not be applied too tightly and should be double-locked when safe to do so. Once a suspect is handcuffed the security officer is responsible to see that they don’t trip or fall.

It is also important not to pile on top or leave the handcuffed suspect face-down on the ground too long to avoid “positional asphyxiation”. Hog-ties should not be used by security officers.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Level Four

Chemical Agents. Sometimes when the suspect is violent or threatening, more extreme, but non-deadly measures must be used for self-defense to bring the suspect under control or affect an arrest.

Before moving to level four, it is assumed that other less physical measures had been tried or were deemed inappropriate. When used by surprise, pepper spray and tear gas is an excellent distraction, allowing the security officer time to get away, call the police, or subdue the suspect.

Contrary to media advertising, pepper spray does not have “stopping power” or cause paralysis. An assailant can still grab you, punch you, stab you, or shoot you and will definitely be angrier after being sprayed. Also, tear gas may not be effective on the insane, drug addicts, intoxicated, or hysterical persons. See my web page on Self-Defense: Tear Gases.

Tear gases (CN, CS, OC) can be hand-held, hand-thrown, or propelled. Security officers usually only get involved with hand-held canisters containing pepper spray.

Pepper spray should not be used to protect the property or to enforce business rules. Remember it’s a defensive weapon to be used when lesser tactics have failed or when a physical threat is imminent. Pepper spray bursts need to be directed in the suspect’s face for maximum result and not sprayed wildly at groups of people.

Even though considered non-deadly, chemical sprays can cause a severe reaction and even death to a suspect with medical or allergic conditions. Also, pepper sprays have a blinding effect, and care must be used so sprayed persons do not fall downstairs or walk into traffic or attempt to operate motor vehicles.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Level Five

Temporary Incapacitation. To use force under level five means that the situation was so extreme, violent, and immediate that it was necessary to temporarily incapacitate a suspect prior to the arrival of the police. This includes the use of all methods of non-deadly force beginning with the empty hand up through and including impact tools.

At level five, properly used defensive and offensive moves are allowed under the right circumstances. Choke holds and carotid neck holds can be used but at great risk. Although still taught at many police academies, neck compressions are very risky and used only in extreme situations.

Baton blows to the suspect’s head or throat can be deadly and inconsistent with professional training standards. Temporary incapacitation is used to stop a suspect from injuring you or others long enough to handcuff and control them. Defensive baton blows to soft-tissue and certain joint areas are all consistent with professional security training standards and POST as long as they stop when the incident deescalates.

Stun guns are part of level five, but should not be used by security officers except on special posts and only by those authorized and trained in the use and effects of the device. Stun guns are held-held devices and some like the Air-Taser propel charged darts on leads at a suspect.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Level Six

Deadly Force. When you are in immediate fear of death or great bodily injury at the hands of a perpetrator you are authorized to use deadly force in most states. Check your state laws to be sure.

Deadly force can be applied by your hands, impact tools, or with a firearm. There are few rules, other than negligence, for applying deadly force when it’s justified.

However, deadly force is the highest standard and must be justified. This force continuum will be considered in the aftermath as a test to see if other alternatives to deadly force were used first or were deemed more appropriate.

For security officers, the use of a firearm is inherently dangerous unless reasonable precautions are taken. Discharging a firearm is the most troublesome because of the range of the bullet. You may be justified in shooting a suspect in self-defense that is standing in front of you but not justified in wounding innocent bystanders two blocks away.

Similarly, you may have been justified in shooting a suspect charging at you with a knife, but not justified after he turns to run away. As a general rule, handguns should not be fired at moving vehicles, except in extreme life-threatening circumstances.

Handguns should never be pulled and brandished as a deterrent or be used as a control tool under level three.

Security Guard Force Continuum: Training is Key

To fully understand the force continuum it must be periodically discussed and reviewed by security supervisors. Practical exercises will help reinforce the training and cause the reactions to become more appropriate instead of instinctual. In a crisis situation, fear and adrenaline have a way of accelerating the force continuum. Practice and ongoing training exercises will ease the effects of stress and make a safe outcome more predictable.

For More Information:

  • Shoplifting: Excessive Use of Force

Learn More about Premises Liability Litigation

Download 113-page eBook written by Security Expert Chris E. McGoey

  • Security Expert’s Guide to Premises Liability Litigation
  • Evaluating Crime Foreseeability and Inadequate Security Cases
  • Biography of Chris McGoey
  • Testimonials from a few clients
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Media Interviews
  • Premises Liability Litigation Book
  • Retain Chris as a Security Expert Witness
  • Hire Chris as a Security Consultant
  • Chris McGoey Blog Article Index
  • Crime School Podcast Index

Contact Security Expert Chris E. McGoey

Email      213-537-3505      Twitter

Tagged With: security guard, self defense, use of force

Please share on social media

  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • pinterest
  • stumbleupon

About Chris McGoey

My biography spans 53 years of studying, evaluating, and developing security plans worldwide. I'm a habitual skeptic, a chronic people watcher, a golf fanatic, and a relentless traveler.
Email | Twitter

Related Posts You May Like

  • Apartment Courtesy Officer versus Security Guard Patrol
  • Self-Defense Pepper Spray When Why and How to Use it Safely
  • Safe Room not Panic Room Home Invasion Security Plan for Families
  • Hotel Room Invasion Robbery Security Plan for Safe Lodging at Hotels
  • Nightclub Bar Security Managing Intoxicated and Obnoxious Patrons
  • Bouncer Doorman Training for Nightclubs and Bars is Necessary

Premises Liability eBook

Premises Liability Book

Podcast Reviews

  • Great information and insight
    June 13, 2018 by djpoland from United States

    I have been listening to this podcast now for several months. It is one of the best sources of information concerning crime, security, and ways of making your home and business safe. Keep up the good work. Thank you for all you do to help so many people. DJ in Scottsburg, IN

  • Interesting, provocative, relevant and riveting
    July 29, 2017 by Lindapre from United States

    This is a very valuable service and I appreciate this high level of expertise to keep me knowledgeable, safe and sound. Everyone should subscribe and stay well-informed. Thanks Chris!

  • 10 reasons why burglars might choose your home
    July 28, 2017 by binwoodside from United States

    I am not one of those people who believes there is a bad guy behind every bush but Chris offers good advice that can be very useful to all of us. His tips can prevent us experiencing a home robbery due to our own carelessness. It amazes me that people use social media to advertise their absence from their homes. There are plenty of other points of carelessness Chris describes that also advertises to burglars. His voice is easy to understand and listen.

  • Educational eye-opening strategies for crime prevention
    October 22, 2015 by taylor826 from United States

    He pretty much covers the gamut of high-risk scenario from personal safety to commercial property security. He provides insights to how criminals could perceive potential victims as vulnerable. I don't own commercial property or a business, but the security best practices he outlines which mitigate potential crimes in multiple industries, also increases my awareness to avoid such businesses/locations that don't implement those policies. You don't want to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

  • Excellent content
    July 1, 2015 by Ken Burgin from Australia

    Chris has been the ‘crime doctor’ for many businesses over the years - not much he hasn’t seen and fixed! Great to have his expertise coming to us directly through his podcast interviews. Highly recommended!

  • Crime School Radio is a Winner!
    June 18, 2015 by Liquor License Advisor from United States

    As a security expert, Chris McGoey was and continues to be a trailblazer. First, his informative website and book. Now this convenient, cutting-edge and educational podcast. Chris has an uncanny knack for knowing just what the world needs. With this show, he delivers vital information on safety and security in plain language that everyone can benefit from.

  • Helpful Content for Retail and LEO
    May 21, 2015 by StandardOfTruth from United States

    Chris is an industry expert with real world experience. It is also refreshing to hear a security podcast with crystal clear audio and presented in a professional way.

  • Fantastic! Informative and relevant.
    May 13, 2015 by isntrocketscience from United States

    I have seen Chris McGoey several times as a security expert on TV so I was curious to hear his Crime School podcast. As expected the podcast provides valuable information for keeping us safe and useful ideas for everyday life. I plan to listen to every episode. Keep 'em coming Chris.

  • Home Security Safe Room
    May 13, 2015 by TimInArizona from United States

    Outstanding! Very thorough. I would like to see police departments link to this audio as part of their crime prevention education of their citizens.

  • Great show about crime and loss prevention
    May 12, 2015 by CrimeRx from United States

    A great resource for new and veteran crime prevention practitioners. I have subscribed so I won't miss and episode.

Chris E. McGoey CPP, CSP, ICPS, CAM
McGoey Security Consulting
Jonesborough, Tennessee
951-461-8950
Chris@CrimeDoctor.com

Copyright © 2023 - Aegis Books, Inc and Chris E. McGoey - All Rights Reserved -

Terms of Use  |  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy